tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4859004170239227374.post1556643535378326320..comments2013-12-06T08:27:20.783+10:30Comments on generallyalive: Wednesday afternoonsAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03007495939639770792noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4859004170239227374.post-58527471889060395262011-09-06T19:16:26.932+09:302011-09-06T19:16:26.932+09:30Will send you the part of the book that I read.
An...Will send you the part of the book that I read.<br />And no, for Schulz language is not representational. I think that statement in my blog needs further contextualisation, which I'll do in an email soon.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03007495939639770792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4859004170239227374.post-22201934856358126092011-09-04T01:45:32.823+09:302011-09-04T01:45:32.823+09:30Hmm. This sounds interesting. Will have to find th...Hmm. This sounds interesting. Will have to find this book and read it. Then we could have a discussion. :)<br /><br />So, for Schulz language is representational?Pracheehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18131607368234516213noreply@blogger.com